"What part of the Constitution says "We the animals"? So do this mean can I stand outside an abortion clinic and sue a lady that just had a baby ripped from her womb? So if a person is killed because a gun law disarmed his family, we can sue a libtard? These Freaking Idiots go nuts over a Wood Chuck but not a little innocent baby that didn't even have a chance to take a first breath.
These people are so afraid of legal gun owners, because they are the only thing left standing in their way from a complete take over of our rights. Theses libtards think Bambi or the Lion King is what nature is really like. Hopefully Massachusetts will show common sense but it is Massachusetts, so common sense may have been long outlawed. I swear these assholes never stop. They are like a swarm of flies on a steaming pile of shit, constantly jumping from one pile to the next in an effort strip any and all of our freedoms away. Make no mistake, Hussein and his minion's have a hand in this. The word has gone out to begin every possible assault on the 2nd Amendment. It's standard operating procedure for Hussein and his Reich. An all out assault on America from multiple directions. If this passes, you know it will only be a matter of time before animals will have to have voting rights, medical care, and welfare. Just send the voting slips and money to the local Democraps and they will be happy topass it along to PETA. I wish I was just joking, but you know given enough time theses idiots will get there, one little goose step at a time. I'm going to say a prayer tonight and Thank God I am a conservative." MC
So we’re going to have Team PETA suing human beings on behalf of Bambi? Brilliant!
Via The Sportsmen’s Daily:
Massachusetts State Senator Mark Montigny (D-New Bedford) recently introduced a bill that would allow private individuals to file a lawsuit for the “protection and humane treatment of animals.” This is of great concern for all sportsmen, farmers, and dog owners.
Animal cruelty is already a crime in Massachusetts just as it is across the country. Animal cruelty laws are enforced by experienced law enforcement officers, including local police forces and animal control officers, who are trained on what is and is not animal cruelty under the law and how to spot it.
Senate Bill 767 would end this proven system and instead give private citizens the ability to sue animal owners over what they perceive to be “animal cruelty” under the law.
“Under this bill, animal rights activists would be able to sue anyone – including sportsmen, farmers, and dog owners – whenever and wherever they think animal cruelty is being committed,” said Evan Heusinkveld, USSA’s Director of Government Affairs. “This could force sportsmen and women who have done nothing wrong to spend thousands of dollars to defend themselves against animal rights zealots looking to take them to court.”
For example, if an animal rights activist thinks common dog training practices—such as using a shock collar or tethering—are inhumane, they would now be able to sue the sporting dog owner or trainer claiming animal cruelty. Likewise, an activist that disapproves of certain farming practices could sue farmers for the practices they consider cruel. Even if a judge ultimately throws out the case, the animal’s owner will likely have had to spend a good deal of money and time fighting the bogus lawsuit.
“Enforcement of animal cruelty laws should be left in the hands of trained law enforcement officers and not be given to animal rights activists to harass law-abiding animal owners and private citizens,” said Heusinkveld.
Keep reading…
No comments:
Post a Comment