Barry Whines: GOP “Rooting For Barrycare’s Failure" Wahhhhh

"I don't know about the GOP, but your damn right I'm wishing for Barrycare's failure, and yours too. Which by the way, will happen sooner then you think. Nobody has to 'root for its failure jackass, it's doing that on it's own. Just look at everything this group of utter incompetent morons have had their hands on. After this reich is no longer in power, one could sit down a write a historical flow chart on how to f**king fail. And you would not even have to make anything up. We don't need to root, just sit back and watch the house of cards fall. Is there something wrong with rooting for good to triumph over evil. It's like rooting for the failure of Communism. This is a situation that nobody has to root for or wish anything bad upon. It is a self defeating, self collapsing system and it was designed that way. So now the Wussy in Chief is going around whining that the GOP wants it to fail. Wahhhhh. Would you like a little cheese with your whine? Oh wait,let me get my little violin out to accompany that whine and cheese. What an asshole. Always the victim, never the leader. Maybe it would help if he burst into tears, stomped his feet and wet his diaper. Followed up by rolling around on the stage flailing his arms and legs while screaming. He always has an excuse for his failures. Spoiled communist brat who never reached manhood. For Gods sake Barry, stand up for once in your pathetic life and accept that you are a loser. It might do you some good. 

What did you expect when crammed it down people's throat the way you did? The jackasses responsible for this pile of shit are the democraps in congress, both house and senate, who voted for it without reading it, and the staffers who helped pen this train wreck of a law. Oh, and the worst part of this entire fiasco is that congress, their staffers, dear leader, his administration's

HELLO! Meet the 72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” by the Obama Administration

by Michael Snyder

Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner?  Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order?  Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents.

At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly.  The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists.  But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens.

And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay.  So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke.  The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them.  And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.

Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

Picture, Joke, And Quote Of The Day

Picture of the Day: 

Joke of the Day: 

Quote of the Day: 

     "Some spirit of secession has spread across the land, with various areas in Maryland, Colorado, Texas, California and elsewhere discussing seceding from their states, because of political alienation arising from significant differences in values and preferences. I don’t take the political prospects of American secession movements too seriously, and assume their principal purpose is to gain leverage for their preferred policies within their state governments.

These secessionists have an advantage over those seeking outright separation from the Union – and a big disadvantage. On one hand, they don’t have to deal with the Confederacy/slavery baggage that tends to confound discussions of secession in the U.S. On the other hand, the Constitution, Art. IV, sec. 3 clearly forbids the creating a new state in the territory of an existing one without the latter’s consent, and the consent of Congress. That is a high bar, practically insurmountable.

But there may be an easier way for those who seek to secede from their state – instead of creating a new “51st” state, secede to join an existing state. The Constitution’s requirement of home-state and congressional consent only clearly applies to the creation of a “new state”..." --Eugene Kontorovich