The government spent approximately $1.03 trillion on 83 means-tested federal welfare programs in
fiscal year
2011 alone — a price tag that makes welfare that year the government’s
largest expenditure, according to new data released by the Republican
side of the Senate Budget Committee.
The total sum taxpayers spent on federal welfare programs was derived from a new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report
on federal welfare spending — which topped out at $745.84 billion for
fiscal year 2011 — combined with an analysis from the Republican Senate
Budget Committee staff of state spending on federal welfare programs
(based on “The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government Finance”),
which reached $282.7 billion in fiscal year 2011.
Spending for Federal Benefits and Services for People With Low Income, FY08-FY11
The data excludes spending on Social Security, Medicare, means-tested
health care for veterans without service-connected disabilities, and
the means-tested veterans pension program.
According to the CRS report, which focused solely on federal spending
for federal welfare programs, spending on federal welfare programs
increased $563.413 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $745.84 billion in
fiscal year 2011 — a 32 percent increase.
Further, spending on the 10 largest federal welfare programs has doubled as a share of the
federal budget
in the last 30 years: In inflation-adjusted dollars, according to
Republican staff on the Senate Budget Committee, the amount spent on
these programs has increased 378 percent in that 30 year time frame.
CRS reports that food assistance programs — the third largest welfare
category behind health and cash assistance — experienced the greatest
increase in spending, with 71 percent more spending in 2011 than in
2008. The agency explained that this spending increase was largely due
to the growth in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food
stamps.
CRS further noted that the largest expenditure category, health, was
37 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year 2008. In that
same period, cash aid increased 12 percent, education assistance
increased 57 percent, housing and development assistance increased 2
percent, social services increased 3 percent, employment and training
remained the same (though fluctuated in intervening years), and energy
assistance was 67 percent higher in fiscal year 2011 than fiscal year
2008.
The total federal spending on federal welfare programs vastly
outpaced fiscal year 2011 spending on such federal expenditures as
non-war defense ($540 billion), Social Security ($725 billion), Medicare
(480 billion), and departments such as Justice ($30.5 billion),
Transportation ($77.3 billion) and Education ($65.486 billion) — a fact
that alarmed the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, Alabama
Sen. Jeff Sessions, who requested the report from CRS .
“These astounding figures demonstrate that United States spends more
on federal welfare than any other program in the federal budget,”
Sessions wrote The Daily Caller in an email. “It is time to restore —
not retreat from — the moral principles of the 1996 welfare reform. Such
reforms, combined with measures to promote growth, will help both the
recipient and the Treasury.”
When state spending on federal welfare programs — specifically
Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program — was thrown into
the mix, the amount spent on federal welfare increased 28 percent, from
$798.813 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $1.028.54 trillion in fiscal
year 2011.
“No longer should we measure compassion by how much money the
government spends, but by how many people we help to rise out of
poverty,” Sessions continued. “Welfare assistance should be seen as
temporary whenever possible, and the goal must be to help more of our
fellow citizens attain gainful employment and financial
independence. This is about more than rescuing our finances. It’s about
creating a more optimistic future for millions of struggling
Americans.”
With food assistance spending increasing the most out of every category, Sessions, who has been sounding
the alarm on the expanding food stamp rolls, noted that the Obama
administration has allowed for the food stamp increase through
misleading promotion and a disregard for self-reliance.
“The administration ludicrously argues
that every five dollars in food stamp spending results in nearly 10
dollars in economic benefit. They insist that communities ‘lose out’
when more people don’t sign up for benefits,” Sessions noted. “[The
United States Department of Agriculture] even awarded a recruitment
worker for overcoming people’s ‘mountain pride.’ Is this a hopeful vision for the future? Do these priorities make our country stronger and our economy more secure?”
No comments:
Post a Comment