Blame the movie.
Blame the movie.
Blame the movie.
Even though "the movie" was on YouTube
for months prior to the collective indignation of thousands of Middle
Eastern Islamists all coming together on the eleventh anniversary of
September 11th (through wild coincidence, no doubt), we are being told
by our government and our media overlords that we must blame the movie.
You see, if we blame the movie for the
burning of our foreign outposts and the brutal murders of four Americans
(including our Libyan ambassador who was reportedly raped), we won't
blame the burners and the looters and the murderers and the rapists.
You see, if we blame the movie for the
Middle East burning, we won't blames the Islamists who are doing the
burning and looting and raping and murdering.
Which means we won't further connect
the dots and blame Obama's failed Middle East policy; the Obama Doctrine
of backing away from the region and allowing events to unfold as
America stands idly by -- as the Islamists in the Muslim Brotherhood
grab hold of power in Egypt, a country that was once our largest and
closest ally.
Blame the filmmaker.
Hunt him.
Out him.
Demonize him.
Burn the straw man!
And all at the direction of a president
of the United States who has sworn to uphold the Constitution, you
know, the same Constitution that treasures the right of free expression
and speech above all else.
But no one asks … What about Bill Maher?
Bill Maher?
Bill Maher made a comedy/documentary
called "Religulous" that's most famous for mercilessly mocking
Christianity. But what people forget is that the last twenty-minutes or
so of the film make a damning case against Islam.
Bill Maher made a film that mocked Islam.
Oh, yes, he did.
Bill Maher also contributed $1 million to a pro-Obama super PAC.
And I'm sure that upon being reminded
of this, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will tremble with
self-righteous indignation and demand Maher take his money back.
After all, if movies create the terrorists who in turn create the terrorism, what about Bill Maher?
And what if the terrorists learn that
the president of the United States is benefitting from a million dollar
contribution given by a filmmaker who mocked Islam? How will Hillary
Clinton claim with any credibility that the United States government has
no connection to this outrage? How will White House spokesman Jay
Carney say this with any credibility:
“The reason why there is unrest
is because of the film,” he said at one point. “This is in response to
the film.” At another moment, he said, “The cause of the unrest was a
video.” At yet another, “These protests were in reaction to a video
that had spread to the region.”
And the lapdog media just can't stop humping a leg of lies.
It's weird, though, isn't it?
I mean, how Hollywood has been silent
in its defense of the filmmaker Obama is currently scapegoating (and in
some cases, Hollywood is grabbing a torch), even as they embrace Bill Maher.
Well, I guess some anti-Islamic filmmakers are more equal than others.
And thank heavens, we have Barack Obama to tell us who the more equal ones are.
No comments:
Post a Comment