Deal With Iran “Not Based On Trust” Says Lurch

Via Politico:
Secretary of State John Kerry says the Iranian nuclear deal is based on verification, not trust with Iran.
“Everybody has a right to be skeptical because there are indications that there are people in Iran who have wanted to pursue a weapons program, Kerry said in an interview aired Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “That’s why we don’t take anything at face value. That’s why you don’t take it for granted.”
Asked if he were skeptical whether Iran would actually comply with the signed deal, Kerry said trust wasn’t necessary, and no one was expecting Iran to “turn over a new leaf.”
“There’s nothing built on trust,” Kerry said. “You don’t have to trust the people you’re dealing with, you have to have a mechanism put in place whereby you know exactly what you’re getting and you know exactly what they’re doing.”

"Verification? Verification of what? The Ayatollah's word? It that any better than the "verification" we got from Kim Jong (mentally) Il 18 years ago? The people in this administration are not just f**king idiots, they horrifically dangerous f**king idiots. Traitor Kerry is right about one thing, it's not based on trust. It's based entirely on wishful thinking. “There’s nothing built on trust,” Kerry said. “You don’t have to trust the people you’re dealing with, you have to have a mechanism put in place whereby you know exactly what you’re getting and you know exactly what they’re doing.”  WTF kind of psycho bullshit is that? If you don't trust someone, you don't do deals, period! It means they know the Iranians are going to go right ahead and build a nuke to use on Israel, and when that happens they can claim it's the fault of some low-level staffer in Cinnicinati who was responsible for putting up the "mechanism" they trusted. Complete incompetent idiots! So a liar and a war protester are experts about "trust"? Nothing but two anti American cowards, Obowel and Kerry. Can't wait to hear the Liar in Chief tell Israel "If Israel wants security they will have security Period". Yeah right, only if they provide it THEMSELVES! Bibi is done talking to these two idiots. He will act before listening to any words these two morons have to say. As for me, the only words I want to hear from this Sec. of Mental State is "As of today, I resign as Secretary of State and renounce my US citizenship. Along with Jande Fonda, we will live together with our brothers and kinsmen back in Vietnam".

Why do I have this mental image of Neville Chamberlain waving his peace in our time treaty with Hitler pop into my mind. My God, these dumb ass Libtardss will fall for anything. I have a very bad feeling this is by far the most dangerous and deadly thing Obowel has done, or will do, for the rest of his reign of terror on the

Picture, Joke, And Quote Of The Day

Picture of the Day:

Joke of the Day: 

Quote of the Day:
"Here’s an example of the Gates-funded[, Common Core] curriculum’s math that’s actually being used in New York public schools:
3. Sally did some counting. Look at her work. Explain why you think Sally counted this way.
177, 178,179,180, 190,200, 210, 211,212,213,214.
Ummm…the only answer I can come up with is because Sally learned to count from Common Core." --Poor Richard

“I Am Not A Free-Marketeer. . . I Believe In The Heavy Hand of Government” Says Comrade Bill DeBlasio

 Via NY Post:

Business leaders in the city are scratching their heads over recent remarks by Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio.Describing how he plans to govern once he takes office next year, the mayor-elect declared flatly that he doesn’t believe in the free-market system.“Everything you heard about me is true. I am not a free-marketeer. . . I believe in the heavy hand of government,” de Blasio stated matter-of-factly during an hour-long presentation to some of the city’s biggest real-estate developers.Now that de Blasio’s been elected mayor with a resounding 73 percent of the vote, his comments have become a hot topic for business people trying to digest what life will be like with Comrade Bill in charge

"Boy did NYC f**k up voting in this libtard commie clown. Again, elections have consequences, and when you vote stupid, you take your chances. Get ready NYC, you are about to become a "Freedom-free Zone". It will be an absolute joy to watch the "takers" get the government they voted for. Could someone pass the popcorn? Can't wait to hear the whining begin. 73% of you voted for this commie. Good job NYC. The NYSE, The NASDAQ, and Amex, and every other big business better pack it up and move to a more Capitalist state and city if they know what is good for them. Anyone still sane should pack up and leave while you can otherwise there'll be no escape. Why put up with NYC prices, regulations, and taxes? Toll fees, bus, and subway fares, the price of bagels will all skyrocket. Pull the plug and move the servers elsewhere. Then the next stop for NYC will truly be Detroitville. I'm sure after Blazio's speech, there will be a mass exodus from Socialist City before taxageddon occurs. The term for NYC mayor's is 4 years. By the time Blazio term ends, he will have run off most rational thinking New Yorkers, and all that will be left are the hard core Commies, the gimmie's, and LIV's to vote him in another term. 

America yearned for a return to the Carter years, with the re-election of Obowel. I guess NYC yearned for a return to the Dinkins years. Just as America is getting it good and hard, you NYC moron's are about to get it even gooder and harder. Bend over New Yorkers, your going to get the full Socialist treatment. Say "goodbye" to your tax base. Who will this asshole tax the living shit out of when most of the businesses owners there pack up and move to more suitable business environment locations? Maybe all you brain-dead, self-seeking parasite's who voted for this commie clown? You dumbasses of NYC knew this about this socialist POS, yet you still elected him. I just hope Obowel is out of office before this dipshit bankrupts NYC and wants a fed bailout. Your new mayor says he believes in the "heavy hand of government”. How often has that worked out? Unless the intention is to kill and starve people by the millions. The next four years should prove interesting for NYC. The big question will be how many new taxpayer-funded programs will there be that New Yawker's will be compelled to fund? Enjoy your new mayor New Yorkers. You deserve every bit of what's coming your way. You made your choice, now enjoy it." MC

Picture, Joke, And Quote Of The Day

Picture of the Day:

Joke of the Day: 

Quote of the Day: 

 "Of particular importance in protecting minority rights is Senate Rule 22, which requires a supermajority of two-thirds of Senators to end debate on any proposal to amend the Senate Rules. In the past, a few Senate majorities, frustrated by their inability to get certain bills and nominations to a vote, have threatened to ignore this two-thirds requirement and instead to change one or more debate rules by a simple majority. Because that step would change the Senate into a legislative body where the majority can, whenever it wishes, change the rules, it has been dubbed the “nuclear option.”

Arguments about the nuclear option are not new. This question has been debated for decades. Confronting the same question in 1949, Senator Arthur Vandenberg, a giant of the Senate and one of my predecessors from Michigan, said that if the majority can change the rules at will, “there are no rules except the transient, unregulated wishes of a majority of whatever quorum is temporarily in control of the Senate.” Changing the rules, in violation of the rules, by a simple majority vote is not a one-time action. If a Senate majority demonstrates it can make such a change once, there are no rules that bind a majority, and all future majorities will feel free to exercise the same power, not just on judges and executive appointments but on legislation...

...Today, we once again are moving down a destructive path. The issue is not whether to change the rules. I support changing the rules to allow a President to get a vote on nominees to executive and most judicial positions. This is not about the ends, but means. Pursuing the nuclear option in this manner removes an important check on majority overreach which is central to our system of government. As Senator Vandenberg warned us, if a Senate majority decides to pursue its aims unrestrained by the rules, we will have sacrificed a professed vital principle for the sake of momentary gain." --Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI)