}
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. -- Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson

Liberalism: Ideas so good, you have to be forced to accept them.

''ARE YOU AN AMERICAN --or a LIBERAL.''


Dance Along

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Lib-Think… MSNBC Hosts In ‘Really Deep’ Segment On Need To Call Him ‘President Barack Obama’ In Every Single Reference (Video)


"So BSNBC thinks its disrespectful to call Obama, Obama? I call him Obama or Barry when I’m in a good mood. When I’m not in a good mood, it’s “that POS communist asshole in the White House”. Any way. Are these the same people that called Bush, Bush? And leave it up to the white hating racist Toure to bring up  the race factor. Up yours, Toure, and up yours, Hussein, too. Considering the lack of respect that most people with common sense have for Barry, he should consider it fortunate that we call him Obama. Once he’s worthy of respect we can have a discussion about whether calling him something is disrespectful. But I don’t expect we to have to worry about that anytime soon. I wonder what the millions noticing paychecks lighter today, due to payroll tax hike are calling him. I’d like to call him “Gone”. MC

The brains at MSNBC held a discussion tonight on whether or not it is disrespectful to call Obama, Obama?

On Friday, MSNBC’s The Cycle investigated the outrage directed at cohost Steve Kornacki, as well as other journalists, for referring to President Barack Obama simply as “Obama” after the first reference. Seriously and without irony, this happened. And the hosts of The Cycle performed this auspicious duty without screaming obscenities or throwing objects into the cameras. It is a feat that I doubt I could replicate.

Kornacki says he was inundated by angry emails and tweets from the president’s supporters after he referred to Obama on the second reference as simply “Obama.”

Rather than dismiss this nonsensical and embarrassing zealotry off hand, he engaged his detractors in a reasoned way. He explained writing style, and how reporters and opinion writers – including those at the New York Times – will most often only use formal titles in the first reference to an individual. Thereafter, the person is most often simply referred to only by their last name.

Kornacki noted that many of the individuals criticizing him were African-American, and he likened their pride
in the president to the pride shared by Irish and Catholic Americans in President John F. Kennedy.

Krystal Ball said that it was understandable that Obama’s supporters became incensed over the supposed slight by Kornacki because he has been so disproportionately disrespected compared to other presidents. She noted that she is also guilty of being overprotective of female officeholders, sometimes insisting that they be addressed by their full titles.

“We’re touching on something really deep here,” Touré opined. “[People] feel very defensive as well, because of the very racist – very nakedly racist — attacks on him that we see constantly.” He noted that the word policing was “silly,” but a sense of defensiveness about the “hatred” Obama faces is legitimate and justified.

Thankfully, S.E. Cupp added a bit of healthy skepticism into the conversation when she noted that the last president – and all the other 42 presidents who served before him – was generally treated with slightly less reverence in the press than their supporters believed they deserved.

Most certainly, no prior president has merited their own style guidelines when writing about them.

No comments:

FORE!!!!

Teleprompter Fail 1

Teleprompter Fail 2

Teleprompter Fail 3