Sotomayor Ruled in Favor of Muslim Inmate’s Ramadan Dinner But Rejected Christian Hobby Lobby’s Appeal for HHS Exemption

"Another Communist/ Socialist/ Islamic Fascist Sympathizer in our government; just move along, there is nothing new here. But remember, she is a “WISE LATINA” that was only wrong 70% of the time (i.e. 70% of her decisions were reversed by a higher court). But in a libtard world, being right 30% of the time gets you a supreme court nomination. Where I came from, a 30% grade was not considered outstanding, but hey, we have to dumb things down for people like here. If you cannot see what is taking place before your eyes then you my fellow Americans are blind. If what you see is not blatant partiality in its highest regard then again you are plain ignorant. This goes by the name payback. It’s their form of paying back what was given to them in mass voting/ money.What better way to break your opponent than by making him/her betray they’re core beliefs". MC

Justice Sotomayor ruled in favor of Muslim inmates but ruled against Christian business owners.

The Supreme Court denied a request by Hobby Lobby, a Christian-owned company, to shield the company from the controversial contraceptive mandate. Justice Sonia Sotomayor rejected a request for an emergency injunction that would have shielded employers from the mandate. Hobby Lobby could face fines of up to $1.3 million a day if they do not comply to the Obama mandate.

Yet, as Laura Ingraham pointed out, in a previous case Sotomayor ruled for a Muslim inmate who was
denied Ramadan meals. In Ford v. McGinnis, 352 F.3d 582 (2d Cir. 2003), Sotomayor wrote an opinion that reversed a district court decision holding that a Muslim inmate’s First Amendment rights had not been violated because the holiday feast that he was denied was not a mandatory one in Islam. Sotomayor held that the inmate’s First Amendment’s rights were violated because the feast was subjectively important to the inmate’s practice of Islam.