Dimwit Writes Article Asking If OJ Was Right About Not Being Nicole’s Murderer

In a perfect world, OJ and Obama would be cell mates.
People who think OJ is innocent are Obama voters.


In a column by Jennifer White, she asks could OJ have been right all along?

Could O.J. have been right after all?

New evidence suggests, Glen Rodgers, a little known serial killer, was actually the murderer of  NFL star O.J. Simpson's ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. The 1994 murder trial shocked the world when OJ was found innocent despite what many considered conclusive evidence.

In a full-length documentary sent to air Wednesday, Investigation Discovery Films examines how Florida death row inmate Glen Rodgers is tied to the murders.

No, Jennifer. OJ is the killer. 

I can give you a mountain of evidence if you need to see it.
Here is just one piece of evidence that “police frame-up” morons bought into:

-Killer lost his left glove during the murder.

-Killer dripped his own blood to his left while walking away from scene.

- OJ received a cut to his left knuckle the night of the murder.

- The blood was OJ’s, but according to Barry Scheck, this was easily explained:

The criminologist collected the REAL killer’s blood at the crime scene, but the samples stayed in a
hot truck which “erased” the killer’s blood collected on the bindles. When the bindles lay exposed on the counter at the testing facility, OJ’s blood sample vial was opened and there was a spray of DNA that went in the air and contaminated the voided bindles, making it seem as if OJ’s blood was collected at the scene.

Yes, folks, THIS WAS SCHECK’S TESTIMONY.

It was remarkably lucky for the police to decide that they should place false blood evidence at the scene that OJ unluckily fit, not even knowing if the guy they decided to frame was even in the country, let alone Brentwood.

Friggin idiots.

People who think OJ is innocent are Obama voters.